Followed: Serbia is a state of genocide and point!
(7 years ago)Reflecting in 2003, when the War Crimes Prosecutor began her work, Natasa Ka persecuted noted that the current situation is difficult to understand, as the beginning of the process of determining responsibility for crimes was surprisingly good. How could a country that committed war crimes over [...]
Reflecting in 2003, when the War Crimes Prosecutor began her work, Natasa Ka persecuted noted that the current situation is difficult to understand, as the beginning of the process of determining responsibility for crimes was surprisingly good.
How is it possible that a state that has committed war crimes on Kosovo Albanians during the NATO bombings assumes the right to place something on the territory where such things have been done for such a cruel time? This is a question raised by Natasa Ka persecuted, founder of the Humanitarian Law Centre, in the discussion of the “Partim panel, confrontation with the past and the region, where are we going and where are we going? Persecuted, he said there are many material records, criminal records, cases transferred from The Hague, while Serbia is increasingly far from the rule of law.
As a particular threat to further decline and such a bad situation, she cites the fact, that chief war crimes prosecutor Snezana Stanojkovic in her programme, under which she was elected to that post, stressed that the practice of trials in absence should be put in place.
Jelena Dikovovic, Dana's journalist, said that since 2014 no war crimes charges have been filed in Kosovo, and that state officials and members of Serbia's government deny the genocide in Srebrenica and promote convicted war crimes criminals, and that even the head of the Srebrenica massacre, Ratko Mladic, has been involved. While Great Britain's Ambassador to Belgrade Denis Keefe came up with the political damage to denying responsibility for war crimes committed, stressing that concern was followed with the aim of halting transitional justice, the main cause of regional instability. He added that The Hague Tribunal had completed its role, but that it was necessary for all war criminals to be punished, that each country in the region must face its own responsibility.
British diplomat reiterated that countries in the region have not done enough in advancing the prosecution of war crimes, stressing that it is unusual that all countries have agreed to the number of victims, but there is continued resistance to responsibility for victims and sentences. /Periscopi