Scandal: <x0 Biology=x1>

Texts brought by the book of Biology about children with Down syndrome are very inaccurate from a scientific point of view. It should be urgent to review and correct mistakes made.

Converts

• We have discussed on this subject how the school text of Nature Sciences”Biology” approaches people with Down syndrome, which is characterized by”mongogued”, ” ”, and that doesn't live more than 10-16 years. The text in question has been published and reprinted over 10 years without any correction from Kosovo's August even despite the response. Two prospects have been used: sociological and medical, over 20 contemporary references, articles and research by world researchers, published in prestigious magazines and media.
• We have concluded that the text” Biology” has incorrect and unrealistic content, insulting and unhuman, primitive and outdated, which does not correspond to research and new scientific findings for Down syndrome. The approach used in articulating the Down syndrome problem is unprofessional for two reasons: First, it's a primitive and racist approach that uses the ethnic classification <x2-mongogued” and the lowest psychological capacity”idiotes” that does not correspond to the modern characteristics of people with Down syndrome. Second, the terms are used in the negative context that culturally produce offensive effects of physical, psychic, and intellectual integrity.
• Using”mongoids” and”idiotes” for describing human psychic and moral capacity has started to be used in the century. 19, but now with the development of science and technology this approach is unrecognized, unrealistic and discredited. Text correction has many reasons because disease evolves, medical conditions are advanced, and their treatment should have more affirmive concepts.
• <x0 characters with Down syndrome suffer along with their families and are unaccepted into society” is an unstable social stereotype, although this is specifically not said in the school text. This is evidence of the research of known international researchers as: Brian G. Stotko, Susan P. Levine, Richard Goldstein, Jamie Edgin, Fabian Fernandez, Bruce F. Pennington, Caroline B. Mevis, and those Albanians like Ismail Lutoll and Zenni, who continue to live by this scripture, who testify that the DS persons are worth and not burden of society, are accepted in society, families are proud of them, their reports with others are positive, their situation is a health-advised challenge, and their love for them is unconditional.
• The claim of authors that people with Down syndrome don't live more than 10-16 years is unstable. According to foreign experts Tony Holland and Brian Stotko, and Albanian Ismail Lutol lives Zenun, the average age of people with DS today is 55-60 years, thanks to advances in medicine, improved living conditions, advanced technology, medical and surgical means, improved quality of education, development of medical disciplines.
• In order for DS people not to be subjected to ridicule, discrimination, marginalisation, stigmatisation and insult and integrate into society so that they can express and manifest their ambitions and talents in a creative way, it must first be institutional approach to them to improve, the corresponding text to correct and society begin to accept as people who can contribute to the community, perhaps it is evidence that they have values.
• So researchers who don't respect the principle of diversity, who have no human feeling, who don't think of the effects produced in dealing with sensitive problems, which their theories rely on stereotypes, that language and concepts have irreverent and insulting, and that their texts and lectures do not correspond to contemporary new references and research, do not deserve to be authors of textbooks because their effects on students are harmful.
• The authors of the book must distance themselves from their old, unstable, and insulting approach. Also, August in the new edition of books for 2019 should correct the text of biology and include a new text with new scientific findings confirming the rights and integrity of people with DS.

Need to Review and Correct School Texts

Once again the public debate on review and correction of textbooks is highlighted. This should be done for many professional, scientific, historical, cultural, human and social reasons. With the change of society, with the evolution of many of the natural processes that have impact on public health, with the advancement of the value system, new paradigms and theories have been added, some of them modified, and some have become less or more applicable. This has raised human consciousness, produced new expectations and demands, and changed social thinking in relation to categories of people with special needs, from traditionally primitive and discriminated against, to modern affirmative and human. This is an argument that protects the idea that textbooks should be advanced.

This is in the function of adapting texts with reference and finding new studies and in the function of eliminating findings, claims and non-proved hypotheses; in the function of eliminating social stereotypes that produce discrimination and inequality; in the function of adapting topics with cultural context; in the function of creating a more human and social approach in relation to marginalized categories. One such category is that of people with Down syndrome.

Anjuta category of people with Down syndrome in school text”Biology”

In my experience as a social class teacher in Pristina, one of the principles I've been working on has been that I've been involved in the teaching/learning process, and I've respected this to the only student I've ever been with DS. Adoplic and human treatment to him has been not only a professional but moral duty.

If we look at a child with special needs, with Down syndrome, we will see purity of heart and long - suffering, hope and optimism, curiosity and humor, ambitions and desires, courage and compassion, patience and positiveness. He has no prejudice, no jealousy, no pathological hatred, no racist approach. Hence, they deserve social and spiritual respect, not just them but their families.

Such families or partners who have children with DS need emotional preparation, moral support, willingness to embrace a new perspective that values acceptance, sensitivity, and unconditional love for their children with DS. So many such parents feel proud of their children.

At the end of this year, I was engaged in legalizing a project to integrate people with special needs in the labour market. During this experience I have been notified of some challenges and problems, reflecting elements of discrimination. I've researched and read some school texts of natural sciences about how to access these categories and I've come up with a primitive scientific, irreverent language, insulting and moral discrimination, contrary to the principle of tolerance, the principle of diversity, the principle of school and intellectual communication, which I realized had been public response to even from the &amp;M.C.

I learned that this text exists in the book” Biology”, for classes 9/10/11/12. But I'm referring to the 12th grade book, with the authors: I. D. Bayraktari, A. Berisha, F. Halili, A. Gashi. In this book, page 17, in the teaching unit” Subsequent diseases in man: Chromosomepatia. The result of structural and numeric shifts of chromosomes” writes, among other things:

” Downi's syndrome (Trisomious pair 21) or Mongolian idiotia is the most common number of chromosomes and is represented at 1/700 in newborns. The wearers of this disease have Mongol - eyed eyes and have a number of body disorders (in the bloodstream, in the digestive organs), metabol disorders, with mental impasses (at the level of idiots), are low in growth, and do not live more than 10 to 16 years. ”

This consisting and this approach has provoked me to investigate and analyze from two perspectives: sociological and medical/healthy.

To argue this conclusion and access, we have used 20 references from foreign and local authors and researchers of medicine, genetics, psychology, psychiatry and foreign media authors, specific articles and research on Down syndrome.

Prudent Frenology Access to Down Syndrome Exploration

According to the British Encyclopedia, frinology deals with the study of skull structure and conformity as indications and demining of mental, intelligence and character traits. This had its effect in the last two centuries but since the century. 21 doesn't have much support and is being discredited daily by new scientific research (see: https://www.britannica.com/topic/phrenology). This is a primitive approach and perspective in explaining Down syndrome and related indicators, which the aforementioned authors have used in the school text of biology.

Using Versatile Terms “Mongoloids“ i n “Idiots.“ against DS people

There are some provocative terms that biology authors have used to describe individuals with DS, and unfortunately over 10 years this text with these <x0-mongolesoids” and “idiotes” has been reprinted without correction.

According to the American Dictionary Merriam-Webster Unabridged, the term”idiot” has been used since the century. 14, which over the years has taken on various linguistic and cultural significance. But since the century. 17 This word is used in theater in an offensive language sense, similar to how it is used today. In the context of contemporary communication, in cases of expression of discontent with other people's actions or behavior, many people choose to attack the level of intelligence with insulting words like”idiot”, ”debil”, ”budalla”, etc. A certain contingent of offenses has a history of clinical use, within a psychological classification of different levels of capacity, but also has a history of cultural purpose and effect. For example, the mental development of idiots is said to not exceed the mental development of a normal 2-year-old child (see https://www.meriam-webster.com/words-at-play-ordiot-imbicile-offensive-hiblid=IWAR2Sflrubeks3X psbuBciUyaE-ErXXXXX40GI1PIPIZQUCUCUCUCWCWWCWCWCWCWCWCWCWCWCVS).

The term <x0diotes” mentioned by the authors of the book of Biology is understood in the cultural context of Albanians as an offensive term to offend another's intelligence, so under no circumstances would be used by them, much less for naming DS persons. If we look at the degree of intelligence, the lowest is rated at”idioti” with intelligence quotas under 20 (see: http://www.iqcomparsonsie.com/iqbasis.px?fbclid=IWARWWW5VTVWWWWGHEH1Y1W6W7FISRUBYBY-BBBBBBBYWCW), which, according to the very poor thinking, which is described as being described as not taught and self-instructed.

But this is attributed to the person with Down syndrome is highly inaccurate and immoral when it is known that in certain areas, thanks to contemporary advances, they show high skills and in no way are at the level of idiots. Perhaps what you call <x0diotes” is just one, since its level, the categories that you use to explain phenomena and phenomena, are theoretically primitive, historically outdated and culturally offensive (insulting not only because of its effect but also because of its content because in the term”idiot” is accepted as an offensive term).

But how the term “mongol” or the ethnic classification for describing people with Down syndrome explains to us a Mongol author, Uganda Ramsay, in her writing and documentary published on BBC “The meaning of Mongolia”. She was the mother of a child with Down syndrome in 2009 who passed away three months after birth. Her interest has been to investigate why her ethnicity is linked to Down syndrome. It tells the story, context and effects of this wrong context and its connection even to the term “idiot”. It says the term “mongol” is still used and there are 20 countries in the world using that term. Its facts and explanation show how primitive and derogatory approach is to use these terms for DS persons.

Among other things about the BBC, she says: “John Langdon Down, since 1860, began to classify patients known as “idiotes”, noting that a group of them had similar views. Citing a piece of pages, eye form, and other physical traits, he wrote in 1866: “A huge number of born idiots are typical Mongols.” The name “mongol” has continued despite doubts of Downey's contemporaries, views that Downy published in script “Observations on an Ethnic Classication of Idiots”. In 1965 The People's Republic of Mongolia complained to the World Health Organization that the term used was derogatory to them and was replaced by “Syndon”. That word was still common in the United Kingdom in the 1980 ' s. The two meanings of the Mongols “idiotes” and “Mongols have a nomad tradition. They are good at different situations, have good survival skills and are traditionally hospitable. John Langdon Down first stigmatized the Mongols by linking them to limited capacity and 100 years later after it was admitted that the word “mongollahun” should not be used in the context of Down syndrome, people rebuke or fight against it because they know it's bad. This term has been used in a derogatory way in 20 countries according to my list. A half-mexican and semi-mongolesan one day, telling me that in the Latin community, the words “mongolio” and “the Mongol” still have very ugly meanings. Another man from Morocco told me that they have a son with Down syndrome and that neighbors call him Mongol and throw stones at him on the street. In the United States, some of my Mongol friends were stopped on the street by a lady who insisted that they should take their child to a doctor because she suspected she had Down syndrome. And while I was in a course in London, Chinese and French classmates told me: “we didn't know that someone from Mongolia could be normal and smart like you.” (see: https://www.bc.com/news/blogs-wise-30129358).

Another popular author, Gillian Orr, in her article Why do the words "mongoguel", "mongoloids" and "mongy" continue to be an insult?, published in the prestigious media The Independent, offers some explanations and interesting facts. This too refers with concern to identifying individuals with DS with the physical identity of the Mongols. But above all, it says that John Langdon Down himself after a while has given up his view that intelligence and character can be determined by the appearance and external shape of the head. Among other things, in her writing she says: After John Langdon Down's writing, it is possible to classify different types of conditions according to ethnic characteristics. Before that, someone with Down syndrome was classified as just a “idiot”. In Ramsay's documentary, the author of Down's biography, Professor Connor Ward, explains that Down was a distinguished doctor who worked with those who had limited learning skills. But since the group of people he was treating had the same view, he came with the diagnosis “Mongolian Idiocy” “Mongolian Idiotism”. Later, Down doubted his job. He abandoned his belief in frequency after 10 years of study and gave up the view that a person's character and intelligence could be determined by the appearance and appearance of his head. Downey's contemporaries were also skeptical of his theories and began using the term “as an idiot, Mongolian” in medical letters. In 1959 alone, after French geneticist Jérãom Lejeune discovered the cause of Down syndrome (an additional copy of chromosome 21), they began to suggest the use of a different term toward Mongolian and Mongol. “Mongoli” and “mongolooid” remained in use in British hospitals until the 1980s. Precious geneticists (including Downey's grandson) wrote a joint letter to The Lancet, insisting that this term was disgusting and demanded a new name for the situation. Mongolia itself also called for a review. After becoming a member of the United Nations in 1961, she joined the World Health Organization in 1965 and demanded that the term “mongooid<x14 be changed. Since then, the disorder became known as “ (see: https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entratement/tv/pheantures/hy-are-the-words-mongolfoloid-and-mongy-story-about-as-insult-987857.html).

In research on this subject, I was able to contact two experts online. The first is one of the most popular pediatrics and geneticists, Brian G. Scottko, who is Director of the Down Syndrome Program in Massachusetts and who has completed his studies at Harvard Medical School, which I informed with the text of biology authors. From Brian, I asked for an opinion, and he, in addition to that, suggested to consult four specific articles of his research, testified that the biology text has outdated content and that it doesn't stand, especially in the fact that life expectancy, as in his view, in the United States the average age of DS persons is 60 years and not 1016 as Albanian authors claim, who have not considered that medical sofism has improved the quality of the DS person, to whom Stotko speaks. Brian G. Stotko, who also wrote to me: “Labinot, looks like you found a text containing very old information about Down syndrome. The average life expectancy for someone with DS in the United States is now 60 years, thanks to advances in medicine and surgery. People with DS are also able to live full and meaningful lives thanks to better educational opportunities that thrive in fulfilling employment and living opportunities” (Brian G. Stotko, M.D., M. P.P., in online co-ordination with Labinot Kunusevci, 18,12.2018).

And the second expert I've contacted with email is Professor Honor Tony Holland, of the Cambridge University Psychiatry Department. Professor Holland informed me that a few years ago it had been two weeks in Pristina and had contributed to the reshuffle of psychiatrists in Kosovo and had had had the opportunity to visit other parts of Kosovo. When I informed him of the content of the biology text by hinting hypothetically at whether the text is outdated, he confirmed it and offered some affirmative explanations, but he also mentioned a health risk to the old men with DS. Among other things, he wrote to me: “You are correct that the text definition for Down syndrome is very outdated in the data data and in the type of language used. People with DS will have a limited and moderate learning ability, and for that reason they will need additional help at school and will likely need support throughout their lives. There is a growing risk of specific health problems, including cognitive heart disease, intestines, and other abnormalities that may need treatment. In view of the possibilities, however, people with DS can lead an active and half independent life by having friends and availing themselves of most of their opportunities. They have a visual.what?a physical condition that is characteristic of syndrome. Life expectancy has improved greatly and their average life has now been 55-60 years. With this increase in life expectancy, there is an increase in risk of developing delinquency due to Alzheimer's disease presented at 50 years of agewhat? from” (Professor Honor Tony Holland, in online co-ordination with Labinot Kunusevci, 19,12.2018).

Nonhuman access and stereotype production

This language and the way to address the problem from a sociological point of view is inconsistent. The language of the text is irreverent, in offensive terms and offensive terms of integrity. By not treating people with Down syndrome with dignity, describing them with mongoloid characteristics (<x0 with mongoloid eyes” and idiotic (”) at the level of idiots”), which have life spans of no more than 10-16 years, is an inadequate approach, is an insult to human, social, moral, physical and psychic integrity of children with DS and their parents. Above all, it's text with demotive effects.

Adaptive behavior shows the way people operate in their social environment. According to an author's research, Jamie O. Edwin, Bruce F. Pennington and Caroline B. Mevis, children and young DSs have high adaptive skills. The DS advantage may arise from these adaptive skills (see: http://mdlab.arizona.edu/edginWS.pdf). This shows that they, while with support and assistance, have the potential to integrate in the social environment, in public communication, in social activities, and can adapt to dominant structures and values. People with Down syndrome and their supporters have always tried to counter prejudice against them by talking about how they contribute to their communities. But community accession is not possible without family admission.

We have read many reactions from people who make family planning to act if they discover that their future child will be with DS, whether an abortion is recommended, how children should be treated when they are born, etc. This shows that parents most need moral support. But how does a parent feel about a DS child when he sees students at school, their child's company, read and teach wrongly stereotypes about their children?

This is evidence that authors of this text of biology lack human and social sense in dealing with health and natural problems. This text was learned in public schools, in natural high school, and produced a wrong perception of DS persons, where students from the effect of these explanations have fed social frustrations to inferiorized, offended and marginalized individuals with DS.

But there is one thing: some of these book authors are university professors at the Faculty of Mathematical Sciences at Pristina University. One of them has also been an expert in developing learning programs for biology classes at Professional Education in August.

We respect their contribution to other studies and do not deny their merits. This reaction is not to deny, ignored, and compressed scholars. But it's only about the treatment they've been treating people with Down syndrome. So with just one text, with a teaching unit, with a certain approach. So since the same text is still taught in schools, if these authors haven't advanced their thinking and attitude, if they haven't distanced themselves from the textbooks and if they haven't asked for public forgiveness, there is danger that this spirit and this treatment expands to academic university size, and if they deal with the problem of DS or ask students for it, they will use the same approach, which will produce single effects, only in greater size.

Wrong perception and stereotype will constantly be produced and reproduced. There will be” allowed” their inhuman and uneven treatment. The feeling of inferiority, emotional isolation, pessimism, will be cultivated in parents who have children with DS. Such an approach endangers the culture of communication and integration that a conscious and emissary part of society is cultivating in relation to persons with DS, treating them with dignity, equality, consideration, respect for social and emotional Senate, thus eliminating all racist, insulting, intlerant, who may have a bad education or filled with stereotypes and prejudices.

Terms like <x0) But the biggest disaster is when human treatment is also lacking in government documents. For example, if we read the National Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Limited Skills in the Republic of Kosovo 2013-23, published in 2013 by the Prime Minister's Office, the term” children with special needs” are mentioned 3 times, while the term” is mentioned 8 times.

Stereotype ” Persons with Down syndrome and their families suffer”

Once and for all, this stereotype must be deconstructed by contemporary empirical research. Misconceptions based on stereotypes can also be found in prominent biologists of the world. Richard Dawkins is an evolutionary biologist and geneticist, author of the book. My God., in which faith and religion are viewed as factors of radical and potentially dangerous, against modern social values, thus promoting the value of atheism and agnosticism”. Such a scientist caused controversy when in response to a woman's hypothetical question planning to have a baby with Down syndrome, he suggested that she abort it by saying: ”Abort him and try again. It would be immoral to bring him into the world if you have a choice. ” In further statements, Dawkins has said that his view was based on the moral principle of reducing general suffering, in this case, individuals with DS and their families, from the perspective of prosperity, but that after public response he had apologized, reports The Guardian: https://www.theguuardiaan.com/science/2014/aug/21/ridard-dachkins-apologists-dawns-syndrome-tweet).

But Jamie Edgin, professor of psychology at the University of Arizona, and Fabian Fernandez, a research associate at Johns Hopkins University Medical School, reacted in a scripture published in the New York Times, countering: Dawkins' argument is flawed. Not because his moral reasoning is wrong, but because his understanding of the facts is wrong. Recent research shows that individuals with Down syndrome can experience more happiness and potential for success than Dawkins seems to appreciate. In 2010, researchers reported that parents of children with Down syndrome have experienced lower levels of stress than parents of preschool children with autism. In 2007, researchers found that the divorce rate in families with a Down syndrome child was lower on average than in families with a child with other conditions and those with a child with no special needs. Of the 284 respondents, in a study for children over the age of 12 who have Down syndrome, 99% of them claimed they were personally satisfied with their life” (see: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/29/opinion/the-truth-about-ddown-syndrome.html).

I'm going to submit further facts from some research articles that, on the date of 18.12.2018 on my email, have come as suggestions from Brian G. Scottco. In support of the fact that people with Down syndrome are valuable and not a burden of society and in the function of empirical deconstruction of the stereotype that DS people suffer with their families, I am referring to the article ”Having a Son or Daughter With Down Syndrome: Perspectives From Mothers and Father”, by the authors: Brian G. Stotko from Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Children Hospital Boston, Massachusetts; Susan P. Levine from Family Resource Associates, Inc., Shrewsbury, New Jersey; Richard Goldstein of the Department of Psychological Onology and Historical Care, Dana-Ferber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; published in 2011 American magazine” Medical Genetics”, which among other things offer this data and statistics: A valuable and reliable study instrument was sent to 4,924 families on lists of six DS non-profit organisations. Of the 2,044 respondents, 99% have reported that they love their son or daughter with DS; 97% were proud of them; 79% thought their view of life was more positive because of them; 5% felt ashamed of them; and 4% were sorry they had them. Parents report that 95% of their sons or daughters without DS have good relations with their brothers and sisters with DS. The vast majority of parents surveyed report they are Happy with their decision to have their child with DS and show that their sons and daughters are great sources of love and pride” (see: http://briansko.com/wp-content/unloads/2015/12/AlEMG-Parent-FINAL-paper.pdf).

Same authors in the same magazine, another research article ”Having a Brother or Sister With Down Syndrome: Perspectives From Sibilings”There are other facts: ”This study requires brothers and sisters about their feelings and perceptions of their brother with Down (SD) syndrome. We have analyzed valuable and reliable observations by 822 brothers and sisters. More than 96% of brothers/ sisters who answered the question showed that they had love toward their brother with DS; and 94% of older brothers express pride. Less than 10% feel ashamed, and less than 5% have expressed the desire to change their brothers for another brother or sister without DS. Among the older brothers, 88% thought they were better people because of their brothers with DS, and more than 90% plan to remain involved in their lives as brothers when they grow up. The vast majority of brothers and sisters describe their relationship with their DS brothers as positive and growing” (see: http://brianskotko.com/wp-content/unload/2015/12/YAMG-Syblings-Fintal-Article.pdf).

In consultation with Albanian doctors Dr. Ismail Lutol and Dr. Zenun lives. ”Each child is a unique personality and all have their rights and needs. Such is a child with Down syndrome who is not different from other children because of their physical specifications, but because they need more care and individual work in their growth and development. Children with Down syndrome seek more attention, love, commitment, and assistance in daily activities. A society's humanity is marked by the support and assistance it offers to people with special needs who for one moment are no less valuable than the rest of society. Texts brought by the book of Biology about children with Down syndrome are very inaccurate from a scientific point of view. It should be urgent to review and correct mistakes made. We're trying every day to educate a new generation in which there is a merity place for everyone, while in these books our children learn that children with Down syndrome are “idiotes” and their life expectancy is only a few years (10-16) as they have access to death as a result of health problems. This doesn't stay.
1. The life span of the patient with Down syndrome over 80, is over 55-60.

2. Heart disorders may be present at around (heart structure disorders, heart valves or large heart vessels) 30-60% of children with Down syndrome. Some of them are harmless, and some are more serious and require treatment or surgical intervention. Progress in cardiac surgery has enabled these problems to be avoided in the early years of life, and further development is in normal condition in this system.
3. Problems in Training Systems - Anatomic Anomalies (e.g. Duodenal stenoise, functional disorder (e.g. G ERB, constipation, nutrients (e.g. Cellic disease, etc. They are problems that are treated conservatively or in less rare cases surgically, and treatment is successful. Captility is a common problem with people with Down syndrome. For most of them, the problem can be reduced by adequate food (dientological food), physical activity, and adequate liquid intake.
4. The problems of life today are completely sustainable and this is no longer considered a reference point for food problems (read writing http://w.ww. family and health.com/gencian-to-phoscate-med-en-dawn/).
5. Thyroid gland problems where the most common is hypothyroidism. A hormone analysis is necessary to assess the function of the thyroid gland (T3, T4, TSH), and it becomes time intervention and is completely solved.
6. ORL's problems of the respiratory system. Children with Down syndrome may have very different problems with ear, throat, nose and respiratory systems with complications to hearing and deaf. If such problems are in time monitored, these too are inevitable. Because of the anatomic specification of the ORL system and the respiratory leaving of people with Down, following it should be close and in control.
7. Immmune problems or mountain diseases are treated in the same way as in other children. Contemporary medical developments and interventions promise further improvement of the quality of children's life with DS. Children with DS's problems are fully manageable medical issues and an adequate intervention in time can facilitate it and improve the results of their development, this additional argument that literature for children with Down syndrome should advance in parallel with health developments.”

These research shows the reality of Down syndrome and brings down all claims that DS children are a burden and not a value to society. The transformation of this social category into the subject of ridicule has produced reactions even when it came from senior political leaders. We have an example when former American President Barack Obama made a joke on a TV show that was called offensive. When asked how well Bowling plays, it says it plays like people at the Special Olympics (comparing its poor skills to those of the Special Olympics racers, organised especially for persons with special needs). Then former President Obama had apologised, arguing that he had no intention of mocking (see https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=7129997&page=1)

Of the skills, potential, and ambitions of people with special needs is the fact that the Special Olympics, which include people with Down syndrome (see https://www.perciolympics.org/). The World Down Syndrome Congress, which is regularly held, also promotes the rights and integration of individuals with DS (see http://wdsc20.org.uk/). Even in Kosovo, individuals with DS have often expressed their inspiring ambitions, manifesting creativity in various activities, so they deserve great support (see http://ww.dow.dosynsyndromosova.org/). But their involvement at work also presents a challenge that is not rarely described as discrimination. Being the beneficiary of pension schemes, their commitment to work, whether short-term or seasonal, automatically interrupts the benefits of pension schemes, which displaces them to seek work (Law 04/ L-131 for pension schemes for disabled persons. We find a lot of people with Down syndrome to impress and impress with their skill or success in a certain field, in a profession, sport or activity, more than those without the DS. So more than ever, they get our support. A displacement by you of this writing is much better for the rights and integrity of the DS people and the better for our human values.