My confession to the crisis in Vetevendosje

It says: Zigjim Hyseni

My experience in coping with the problem within the Movement seems to be responding exactly to the traumatic event. An unexpected match that is painful and lastingly disturbing to the human soul. Nothing will ever be the same again, even though this may be the thing that you want most, except rehabilitation and normalisation can be there. So, as one of the believers, I want to start showing my attitude by confessing pieces of my testimony.

Up and down I heard accusations of what you don't think could happen inside the Movement sometimes. Filan is a service associate, the other is with him because he is blackmailed by him, and the other has been deceived. For some people, the problem was, not a problem, but an opportunity that flows from heaven. By rubbing their hands, they began without hesitation, and they have not stopped proclaiming spies, microborgies, and traitors today. The more constructive they were, the more they tried to prove the contrary, the more suspicious some of their friends became. Sometimes we agreed to stop them, but every attempt has only increased them.

For the sake of truth, I've never heard Albin say anything like that. Publicly at forums, but even at meetings, his position has been consistent with denying any agreement that could be considered recruiting by a foreign agent, or acage. But he (Dardan Moliqaj) has no knowledge of enough reading, so these factors are affecting him, and he can therefore end up in foreign agendas. This kind of lecture deserves sharp criticism. No one, in spite of the theoretical preparation or political position, when judging can allow the position of being judged by what Lacan calls the last trial, a reference point that supposedly knows the meaning and the coming consistency of our current actions, which claims to have access to the legality of historic necessity. To the worse, we need to recognize such authority, and without concrete facts, we can name and label it. This structure of thought leaves no space of freedom, context, or subjectivity. On the contrary, the very lack of this preservative from “the great heir”, which seems to leave us lost and unoriented, is the best opportunity for a creative experience and a fair ethical position.

Political Values Displacement

During this period, behaviour and interhuman relations in the movement have dramatically degraded. A pathological atmosphere of doubt, grim faces, lack of communication and complex communication through social networks.

We have turned political values upside down. If self - sacrifice and self - promotion were once worthwhile, today we face an unprecedented outburst of egos and ambitions. It's no longer a shame to run for yourself. Even promises have been given for certain positions. Just as adultery used to be forgiven if you pay the tribute. We used to try at least to forge criticism of subjectiveness, today I see instrumentization of submission. We used to talk about courage, we've installed fear today. For myself, I have experienced this process of turning around and undoing virtues, morality, and behavior. I've been at the ether telling me some cynics outside the Movement that never believed, but I still like to maintain that trust.

It seems to me that it's very often talked about establishing the founder right now. His or his deeds? What does that mean? Why is it important to know these in the middle of a completely political-organizing discussion? Or is this a way to show whose it is? This is a fatal mistake on both plains, practical and theoretical. So let's start: It's founded or it's got V. HOOVER? Are we talking about the open field, about the event as the discovery of the vacuum (void) of the situation, or the telelogical flow of the first cause? Is it bias as a subject of freedom or historical necessity? It belongs to V IN THE order of prophecy or wonder? By the way we're doing this, we're defined for the first one, and by doing this, we're drawing ourselves the emancipative boundaries because we're closing the field. I've taught them. A huge task was the first one to do just against the excise of foundation. They give you a good date when you see them turning to the figure of One, those who refer to such authors and books. One had shamelessly expressed that we should not hesitate to build the individual's cult.

To make it clear, I'm a nurse for the importance of concrete names at certain times. I know the important process, almost inevitable in politics, is identification. For 12 years, the most popular figure among us has been Albin. After my first victory in Pristina, I have contributed with my flesh and my soul that Shpend does not exceed it. But I will never accept a short, closed circuit being created today. Albin Kurti has been a symbolic figure for a COLEKITY, for the causes and goals set. Without this mediation, we don't need any names. No one, never wondered about the contributions given, the intellectual power, or the charisma. In 12 Years V No. It was political inspiration, though not even theoretical guides for most of us. But never up to these choices - neither in protests nor at election gatherings, no banners - have been hailed more often than V EVIDENCE! And this change does not result from the spontaneous explosion of the masses. We know best how to do this. For whom does the tuban beat and split up the ranks around the hall for cheering, and for whom it stops. I don't care about those who do this, but it hurts me if he knew and allowed Albin.

Single Relationship

I was reminded of the story of a long conversation with a friend he once shared a lot of things with. After everything was exhausted about the development of events after all the problems had been resolved, the meaningful question comes: Tell me, is Albin irreplaceable? That's the question. The question as the last instance that ignores all discussion. You responded positively, good for you. If you can't even ask this simplified way of probleming, or just answer an angry No, the proclamations are ready: opportunist, microborgenous, traitor, spy, enemy of the people. No one is replaceable “Albin told us from prison. I don't know if the ropes agree with him. They've been saying that for a year now.

To prove loyalty to the Movement, less and less ask about concepts, causes, or programs. Now we have the above question. Then, if so, it is legitimate to ask why have we not done so from the start? What is the problem with personality cult? When we attribute godly qualities to man, normal interaction relationships become impossible. There can be no relationship if she's even. There can be no conflict of thought and dialectic tension, while these are the main conditions for a comfortable and vibrant environment in which it is produced and produced. Loyalty cannot be personal, even if the person in question is the perfect incarnation of the idea. This reflects the community of activists within the Movement. The situation, however, becomes disturbing with doors that open out of such relationships. With the movement, it's not immune as before by the deviation and change of attitudes. I won't fall into a pre-determinative position to say that this is going to happen for sure, I don't know here, but with these developments, conditions are created.

When faced with such traumatic experiences, it creates its conditions and causes in a back - and - forth way. There is a man like the Turkish head whom we cross we will solve this situation, as is not a savior as a deux ex machine. I am already convinced that the problem at our door is explained in our form of organization and in the political culture that we have already planted for 12 years. That's why we're all guilty, more or less. For the primus and for democracy, to be official and critical, for Orthodoxy and heterooxy, we'll show another time...

(Autori Zgjim Hyseni has been a member of the V Movement Headship ENVICE!)