Tahiri's testimony in court remains: If you tell me to stay in prison, I'll stay.

Also, the former minister said at the hearing that he did not fear the security measure, but what he described as the court's unfounded decision. Panoram could whiteen all the testimony Tahir gave yesterday:

The Dat of Tihir:

Justice: Are you aware of this personal security arrangement?

Tahiri: Excuse me, but this session is going on to ask me if I'm aware, right? Of course I'm aware and that's why I'm here...

Lawyer: This is a hearing, doesn't that mean the session will be held to ask if my client is aware?

Justice: When I asked you that question, I meant if you would give further clarification...

Lawyer: This session cannot be carried out solely with questions without listening to our claims. We demand that the prosecution's request be revoked. The evidence presented by the State Criminal Prosecutor is not new. It has had them since 20 October and has been reviewed by the Mendata Regulatory Commission in the Assembly. After the review, the commission decided not to accept the prosecution's request to clear the arrest, but allowed the prosecution to carry out further actions. This material, under which you've made this decision, is already known and the same as what was presented to us in the Commission. On November 1st, citizens Orest Sota, who were also found two licenses of Mr. Tahiri, were arrested, while that event attached to his file. That's not right for us. As far as the Habilaj materials are concerned, they are received by Italian authorities and have no connection with the issue in question. The conditions and criteria for which this prosecutor requires this security measure are known to us. My client is an MP, and he's the most interested man to go to the end of this case.

Judges: Do you have evidence to present?

Lawyer: We have no evidence to present. Prosecution material is of the Italian authorities. We want to highlight this and there are no arguments why this measure is taken.

Judges: In the request deposited by the Prosecutor's Office, the entrances of the citizens Tahiri abroad are argued with tools sold to defendants Habilaj and Mr. Sota. Do you have anything to say about that?

Lawyer: Mr. Today and his family have been in the business world for years and it's right with the law. Today is not an incriminating person. Mr. Tahiri's appearance abroad by means of his means shows nothing about incriminating. As for the movements abroad of Tahiri with the “Audi”, let us explain that the vehicle was Mr. Tahiri's and was sold, but even when he used it, he didn't at any time receive it from the persons that were being prosecuted in Italy, but was brought by his uncle. By November 17th, Mr. Tahiri has been abroad and the prosecution body has been aware of this. It wasn't in the Italian state, but it's out for personal or health reasons.

Tahiri: The judge lady, let me tell you that in making the decision on this measure, you have had two options; either call the parties to make the decision, or make the decision and then call the parties. That's what you did...

Justice: That's what the law predicts...

Tahiri: I have the impression that the law predicts both, but I don't want to argue much about this part. What I mean is, is there a risk of me leaving the country for fear of the criminal acts I am accused of? Those are the charges that I knew, I had known before and there was no new charge of me, or any new circumstance that would lead me to leave. If for this decision you were referring to my introductions, I have access to endless exits, which car I wanted with, but for none of them I had any knowledge that the people who owned it were incriminating. It doesn't hurt at all abroad. Even if you tell me to stay at home or in prison, I'll stay. What hurts me is making baseless, unsupported decisions. As for two patents or even two under investigation who have mentioned my name, why should such measures be taken? We have the case of a court chief named after two persons for asking for money for a decision, and no measures were taken for it. I want to tell you, I wouldn't want for you or anyone to take such measures unless they're named after two incriminating.

Justice: Yes, Mr. Prosecutor...

Prosecutor: Depositing requirements is made under law in effect. It is true that on November 21st the complete material translated by the Ministry of Justice of the Catania file has been deposited. This material is one of the main pillars of this requirement. It took us two weeks to examine this material, and this request was made this week. We turned to the Parliament and now turned to the Crimeans.