Periscop analysis: Vetevendosje Movements

The Coalition made with the AKR in Pristina three days ago for the run-off elections sparked the fury of opponents of the Vetevendosje Movement. They attacked her at her strongest point. They attacked him for violating his principles. Also, a statement by the Movement MP and founder Albin Kurti that part [...]
The Coalition made with the AKR in Pristina three days ago for the run-off elections sparked the fury of opponents of the Vetevendosje Movement. They attacked her at her strongest point. They attacked him for violating his principles.
Also, a statement by the Movement MP and founder, Albin Kurti, that part of the disk had been simplified in order to mobilise the phase” made quite a stir. This was the reasoning given about a few words he had said a little earlier that he would not send back to prison people who had said that he would be taking a ride and that the respective institutions were involved.
Unlike other parties, Vetevendosje is not a realist. She realizes that our society is formal, unqualified, uneducated, and essentially corrupting. It could not have been different if we considered the circumstances it emerged from. And in this context, it is natural to become a simplification of language, or in the other case, a collaboration with less corrupt parties that would pollute its legalisation less. It's practically the same service with citizen will in both cases. Because the AKR has received 10% of the vote, so it has part of its civic will. In the meantime, much of society believes in different values as opposed to movement. And what is proposed by these attacks is strange: a political party should exercise its power, only through people who think exactly like it, and have the same purity in government.
Of course, in politics it is impossible to keep moving clean. Democracy requires that you operate through the beliefs and values that society feeds on. And through a political scheme that paints this society through its commitment or non-invention. In that sense, the most meaningless thing would be to have a political party that would be isolated from political circumstances, and would not engage in power. At this point, the constant effort to get polluted makes sense with as much movement as possible. That's pragmatism. And that term, it seems, is foreign to our political scene, having so many unpaved and polluted parties that were often connected to completely unnatural coalitions that gave poor governance.
Vetevendosje can be criticised for anything, but not as far as ideological definition and principles are concerned. Without this political subject, we would find it hard to understand the importance of much that happened in our country in the last 3-4 years. Vetevendosje even was rightly accused of a once non-liberal approach, but already becoming more liberal and pragmatic is absurd to be criticised for not being locked up and idealistic as before.
It is evident that Vetevendosje has moved from its former positions. It is more powerful today in terms of popular support, more under attack, but even more pragmatic.
Vetevendosje's movements should not be seen with pipe, in every corner of Kosovo, in order to conceive a large profit by seeing its image polluted. It is even strange how Vetevendosje's own opponents see its image as pure in the ongoing attempt to find stains. But Vetevendosje is not completely clean. It's not a religious sect that breaks down the bad ones. It is natural to expect movement errors because we are finally talking about a political party.
But here lies the great danger that comes from the way powerful power media devices are designing. Wanting to make others think of Vetevendosje as infallibility, absolutely unsurpassed, they want every mistake, and any pollution of it to be taken as opportunities to cause great damage and eventually to get rid of it politically. To shut it down, because Vetevendosje exists on the preconception it has made to itself, that it is a political party essentially different from those to date.
Whether it is or not, we have already seen it.