Following the Court of Appeals' decision, Milaim Zeka's lawyer speaks

We've applied to cancel the first degree house prison decision, for every minute we're expecting answers. ”, Halilaj said, without information the decision has already been made.

After announcing such a decision, Halilaj reiterated that there is no information, adding that if such a thing has already happened, the Supreme Court will immediately be directed.

” I am not officially notified. Officially, I'm not informed, but if I get complaints about getting rid of any measure within the legal deadline, we'll address the Supreme Court with extraordinary legal means.”, p.Oh, he did.

Even if such a thing happened, according to Halilaj, means that the Constitutional Court and Appeals have failed to handle the matter correctly.

The Appeals Court makes the decision and informs the parties in the procedure, the prosecutor, the lawyer and if not the lawyer directly informs the defendant. I'm not yet notified, but if the Court of Appeals decides such a decision then we as safeguards within the legal deadline are addressed at the Supreme Court's request for protection of legitimacy considering that the Constitutional Court and Court of Appeals have failed to address the case.”, He's done.

Otherwise, earlier by an announcement the Court of Appeals has announced that MP Milaim Zeka will be continued with house arrest, under suspicion of criminal work. “Direct or organisation of the organised criminal group”, “Misery” and “Avoid taxation”.

This is Apel's full announcement:

Kosovo's Appeals Court has rejected it as unconventional based on the alleged M.Z. defender's complaint against the appointment of a month-long house arrest by the Constitutional Court in Pristina, with 17.10.2017.

M.Z. Special Prosecutor for Criminal Work “Action or Organising of the organised criminal group” by Article 283 of the Republic of Kosovo Penal Code, in connection with criminal work “Exchange” from Article 335 of the same code, as well as v.p. “Avoid taxation” under Article 313 of this law.

The Court of Appeals estimates that the first degree court has found right that since there is a suspicion based that the defendant committed high-profile criminal acts, there is a legal basis for the appointment of house arrest, to him, conform Article 183 concerning Article 187, paragraph 1, sub-paragraph 1.1. And 1.2, point 1.1.2 of the Procedure Code.